U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Health Physics Position on the Controlling of Beam Ports, Thermal Columns, and Flux Traps as High Radiation Areas
HPPOS-235 PDR-9111210349
Title: Health Physics Position on the Controlling of Beam
Ports, Thermal Columns, and Flux Traps as High Radiation
Areas
See the memorandum from L. J. Cunningham to J. H. Joyner
(and others) dated May 31, 1991. The narrow radiation
beams from beam ports, thermal columns and flux traps at
reactor facilities may expose major portions of the head
and trunk, and therefore, must be controlled as high
radiation areas. The health physics position was written
in the context of 10 CFR 20.201 and 20.203, but it also
applies to "new" 10 CFR 20.1601 and 20.1902.
This memo clarified the NRC staff position that the subject
areas must be controlled as high radiation areas. A number
of Notices of Violation (NOV) concerning the posting and
control requirements of 10 CFR 20.201 and 20.203 have
occurred at research and test reactors. These licensees
were not properly controlling high radiation areas,
specifically those involving beam ports. [Note: The
posting and control requirements for high radiation areas
are contained in "new" 10 CFR 20.1601 and 20.1902.]
The argument is made by licensees that the radiation
streaming from these beam ports will not cause an exposure
to the whole body. These licensees have taken the position
that narrow beams don't meet the current 10 CFR 20.202 (b)
(3) definition that state in part, " ... a major portion of
the body could receive, in any one hour, a dose in excess
of 100 millirems."
The 10 CFR Part 20 definition of the whole body as
specified in 10 CFR 20.101 (b) (3) includes the head and
trunk; active blood forming organs; lens of the eyes; or
gonads. [Note: The "new" 10 CFR 20.1003 definition states:
"Whole body means, for purposes of external exposure, head,
trunk (including male gonads), arms above the elbow, or
legs above the knee."] Whether these beams are narrow or
not, if they could possibly expose the lens of the eyes,
the gonads or any other major portion of the head and trunk
or active blood forming organs, then the beams must be
controlled as high radiation areas. The revised Part 20
will support this position, and will further clarify it by
avoiding the term "the major portion of the whole body,"
when defining a high radiation area. [Note: The "new" 10
CFR 20.1003 definition states: "High radiation area means
an area, accessible to individuals, in which radiation
levels could result in an individual receiving a dose
equivalent in excess of 0.1 rem (1 mSv) in 1 hour at 30
centimeters from the radiation source or from any surface
that the radiation penetrates."]
Pursuant to 10 CFR 20.203 (c) (5) [or 10 CFR 20.1601 (c)],
if the stated alternatives of 10 CFR 20.203 (c) (2) and (4)
[or 10 CFR 20.1601 (a) and (b)] are not feasible, a
licensee may apply to the Commission for approval of
methods not included in paragraphs 20.203 (c) (2) and (4)
[or paragraphs 20.1601 (a) and (b)] for controlling access
to high radiation areas. If a licensee chooses 10 CFR
20.203 (c) (2) (iii) [or 10 CFR 20.1601 (a) (3)] as the
control option, positive entry control is required.
Methods of positive entry control may include, but are not
limited to, the following:
All entries into high radiation areas are controlled by
requiring issuance of a Radiation Work Permit (RWP) or a
work procedure. This controlling permit or procedure
contains any special instructions and the requirements for
entry into the high radiation area, which may include: a
pre-briefing on the actions to be performed, a review of
current radiation surveys, the requirements of a film badge
or TLD, and a pocket ionization chamber or extremity
dosimeters, signs and barriers to avoid contact with the
beam, and directions not to alter any shielding or
experiment without health physics supervision.
Due to the nature of the potential hazards involved, all
facilities having these types of radiation beams need to
control these areas as high radiation areas. However,
given the diverse nature of reactor types and experimental
configurations in the nonpower reactor community, we could
expect these licensees to implement a wide variety of
practices and controls to satisfy the regulatory
requirement for positive entry control.
This Health Physics Position has been reviewed by all
Regions; the Division of Advanced Reactors and Special
Projects, NRR; the Office of Nuclear Material Safety and
Safeguards; and the Office of Enforcement.
Regulatory references: 10 CFR 20.201, 10 CFR 20.203, 10
CFR 20.1601, 10 CFR 20.1902
Subject codes: 4.1, 4.7
Applicability: Reactors

